From Silos to Synergy: Erik Hosler Explains the Role of Collaboration in Chip Innovation

Deals & Reviews

The most vital developments in semiconductor technology rarely come from one company working in
isolation. As nodes shrink, device complexity increases, and the materials toolbox expands, it has
become clear that innovation in chip design now demands a collaborative mindset. During the SPIE
lithography conference, Erik Hosler, a consultant known for his contributions to advanced patterning
and EUV lithography, highlighted how the field is shifting toward deeper, cross-disciplinary cooperation
to solve some of its most pressing challenges.

 

This growing emphasis on collaboration is not simply about coordinating between teams. It represents a
fundamental restructuring of how the semiconductor ecosystem operates, from how chips are designed
and validated to how tools and materials are co-developed and evaluated. Today, the ability to scale
efficiently, design with resilience, and integrate modern technologies depends as much on partnership
as it does on technical skills.

The End of the Siloed Model

In the early years of chip design, the process could be divided cleanly, with architects specifying the
logic, layout engineers translating it to physical design, and foundries managing fabrication. Today,
those lines are blurred. Modern semiconductors must be co-optimized across power, performance,
area, reliability, and manufacturability. That requires architects, process engineers, materials scientists,
and equipment vendors to collaborate from the earliest phases of design.

For example, logic cells for advanced nodes are now designed with lithographic printability in mind.
Mask constraints, etch bias, and pattern fidelity are no longer back-end issues. They are front-end
design parameters. It means design and process development teams must share data, simulate effects
early, and align tradeoffs.

Likewise, as chiplets and heterogeneous integration become more common, packaging and interconnect
design influence everything from floor planning to power delivery. Collaboration between package
engineers and circuit designers is no longer optional.

Shared Problems Demand Shared Solutions

The complexity of scaling has outpaced the capacity of any single organization to solve it alone.
Stochastic variation, for instance, is a universal challenge in EUV lithography. To address it, developers,
tool manufacturers, and fabrication engineers must work together to evaluate new materials, tune
exposure conditions, and understand defective sources.

Similar dynamics are playing out in the push for High Numerical Aperture (High NA) EUV systems. These
tools require thinner resists, tighter overlay, and more accurate metrology. Toolmakers are collaborating
closely with fabs to adjust scanner settings, with chemical suppliers to develop compatible resist
platforms, and with metrology firms to ensure that performance metrics can be trusted.

 

Pre-competitive research alliances, such as those coordinated by Imec and other R&D consortia, have
become increasingly important. These groups allow multiple companies to share data, pool expertise,
and reduce redundant effort while still maintaining competitive differentiation in downstream
applications.

The Role of Standards and Open Platforms

The emergence of more open platforms and shared standards is also supporting collaboration in chip
design. For example, interface standards for chiplet connectivity, such as Universal Chiplet Interconnect
Express (UCIe), enable companies to mix and match dies from different vendors without proprietary
limitations.

On the design side, the adoption of open-source EDA tools and reference flows is creating new ways for
academia, startups, and system integrators to contribute. These tools are often backed by communities
that provide testing, validation, and optimization, effectively democratizing the design pipeline.
Shared infrastructure lowers the barrier to entry and accelerates the feedback loop between design
choices and manufacturability. It also allows smaller companies to innovate without needing full-stack
control, thereby enriching the ecosystem with innovative ideas and approaches.

Collaboration as a Creative Catalyst

Beyond the practical need for alignment, collaboration often catalyzes creative thinking. When
engineers from different domains work together, they bring different assumptions, models, and
heuristics to the table. This diversity can spark solutions that might never emerge in a homogeneous
setting.

At conferences like SPIE, the power of this exchange becomes visible. Presentations often combine
insights from physics, chemistry, electrical engineering, and computer science. These conversations lead
not only to joint projects but to shifts in how problems are framed and which questions are worth
asking.

Erik Hosler shares, “Lots of great things are going on, and something will emerge.” This perspective
reflects an important truth. The process of innovation often begins not with answers but with
confidence that enough people are asking the right questions together.

Human Networks and Organizational Culture

Innovation does not arise from infrastructure alone. It is shaped by culture. Organizations that reward
cross-functional thinking, support knowledge sharing, and encourage technical curiosity are more likely
to benefit from collaboration. It includes creating platforms for internal tech talks, encouraging design
teams to visit fabrication lines, and fostering relationships between suppliers and in-house researchers.

 

At the same time, leaders must balance open collaboration with intellectual property concerns and
business objectives. The most successful companies know when to collaborate and when to
differentiate. They use partnerships to address systemic challenges while preserving a competitive edge
in areas of specialization.

Co-Development in Action

Consider the co-development of EUV pellicles, thin membranes that protect masks from contamination
during exposure. Their fragility, transmission efficiency, and mechanical integrity are all critical factors.
Developing a usable pellicle requires input from ASML (the tool provider), mask makers, material
scientists, and multiple fabs that evaluated the real-world impact on yield.

The success of this effort was not due to one company solving the problem. It came from shared risk,
iterative design, and collective feedback. It illustrates how challenging problems in chip design often sit
at the intersection of materials science, mechanical engineering, and production organization and how
collaborative innovation bridges those domains.

What This Means for the Future of Design

As semiconductors move deeper into application-specific domains like AI acceleration, biomedical
sensing, and quantum computing, design teams will need even more interdisciplinary knowledge.
Optical engineers will need to understand data center bandwidth requirements. Biomedical specialists
will need insight into packaging and reliability standards. Architects will need to think not only about
logical flow but also about fabrication constraints from the outset.

This growing interdependence will redefine what it means to be a chip designer. The role will expand
from electrical logic design to systems-level integration, requiring communication skills, a broader
technical foundation, and comfort in navigating ambiguity across domains.

Innovation Through Connection

Collaboration is no longer a soft skill or an optional strategy in chip design. It is a core mechanism
through which innovation occurs. As physical limits approach and economic pressures mount,
breakthroughs increasingly arise from shared insight, co-developed tools, and mutual problem-solving.
Technical forums, research consortia, and open standards all provide infrastructure. But it is the human
connections between disciplines, companies, and cultures that make those tools effective. When
talented individuals with different perspectives unite around a challenge, they can accelerate progress in
ways that no siloed team ever could. As the semiconductor industry steps into a future shaped by
complexity and opportunity, collaboration isolation will define its most successful innovations.

Share